Skip to content

Coalition for a Livable Future

Join our email list

Read our Privacy Policy.

Sections
You are here: Home » Publications & News » News » Portland Housing Audit Finds Discrimination in 64 Percent of Tests; City Has Yet to Act Against Landlords

Portland Housing Audit Finds Discrimination in 64 Percent of Tests; City Has Yet to Act Against Landlords

Document Actions
By Nikole Hannah-Jones; The Oregonian
In its first-ever audit to test whether black and Latino renters face barriers in the housing market, Portland found that landlords and leasing agents discriminated in 64 percent of 50 tests across the city.
 
But Portland, which released the results last month, has not gone after the landlords who discriminated or even notified them they were tested, though such discrimination violates local, state and federal fair-housing laws.
 
City Commissioner Nick Fish, who oversees the Portland Housing Bureau, said he was "outraged by the results." But he emphasized that stopping discrimination must include education and cooperation with landlords, not just enforcement.
 
Asked last week whether the city will go after the landlords found in violation, he said: "That's not the right question. The intent is to do a balanced approach. I have concluded that the best approach is to look at changes to the system and not just individual remedies."
 
Monday night, responding to inquiries for clarification, he said in a memo: "We have always intended to pursue enforcement actions against select landlords tested in the audit process." He provided no details or timeline, though the city's time to build cases is running low.
 
Margaret Van Vliet, Housing Bureau director, acknowledged that her agency did not ask the Fair Housing Council of Oregon, which conducted the testing, to seek enforcement against discriminatory landlords. That "wasn't part of the contract scope," she said, but added that punishment remains a possibility.
 
"We take this seriously, and we are working it (the results) through the process," Van Vliet said. "I am not opposed to going after the ones that were blatantly breaking the law."
 
The idea of doing anything less angers a national housing advocate.
 
"There should be consequences when you violate a federal or state law," said Shanna Smith, president of the National Fair Housing Alliance in Washington, D.C. "I find it unconscionable for a city to supply the money for the audit and then not enforce the law."
 
The city paid the Fair Housing Council of Oregon, a nonprofit, $19,000 to conduct the testing last summer. It is part of an analysis Portland must complete every five years to show it's trying to reduce housing discrimination and to keep $9 million to $11 million in annual federal grants.
 
Van Vliet said the agency decided to include audit testing for the first time after seeing the results of audits elsewhere in the state. Audits in 2009 found that landlords discriminated against African Americans in two-thirds of the tests in Ashland and 78 percent of tests in Beaverton.
 
To read the rest of the article click here.

powered by Plone | site by Groundwire and served with clean energy